Washington, D.C. (For release at 5 p.m. July 8)—New research by the Pew Internet Project shows that during some of the most turbulent weeks of the Iraq war nearly one quarter of Internet users (24%) went online to view some of most graphic war images that were deemed too gruesome or horrific for newspapers and television to display. Further, of those who have seen the images, 28% actively sought them out. Overall, however, Americans are conflicted about the idea of these disturbing images being available online. By a 49%-40% margin, Americans disapprove of the posting of such images. A strong cultural divide emerges between Internet users and non-users: Internet users approve of the images being online by a small margin of 47% – 44%, while non-users disapprove by an overwhelming 58% – 29% margin. These are some of the results of a nationwide phone survey done between May 14 and June 17 – a period just following massive world coverage of the murder and dismemberment of American contract workers in Iraq’s strife-torn town Fallujah, pictures taken at the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad, and the capture and beheading of U.S. civilian Nicholas Berg. The horrific nature of many of the war-related images that have appeared online have left Internet users with a range of feelings. “Millions of Internet users want to be able to view the graphic war images and they see the Internet as an alternative source of news and information from traditional media,” said Deborah Fallows, Senior Research Fellow at the Project, and co-author of the report. “But many who do venture outside the traditional and familiar standards of the mainstream news organizations to look at the images online end up feeling very uncomfortable.” Some 51% of those who have witnessed the images felt they had made a good decision in doing so. One third of those wished they hadn’t seen them. Another 7% held both views, and 8% more couldn’t or wouldn’t answer. Women seemed particularly troubled over the entire issue of graphic online images. Some of the evidence: