Online Banking 2006
Way back in 1994, when few Americans had even heard of the internet, most people still walked to their bank’s nearest branch to do whatever check cashing or bill paying they couldn’t do at the corner store or by mail. When a survey by the Pew Center for the People & the Press asked the principal bill-payer in each household, “Do you ever do ‘electronic banking’ from home—that is, use a computer or the telephone to pay bills or move money from one account to another?” fewer than one in ten (9%) among this group said yes, they had done such a transaction. By 1995, that figure had risen to 13% of bill-payers. In 1998, when the Pew Research Center switched to asking all internet users if they ever paid bills or banked online, 13% of this larger group, or about 10 million American adults, said yes.
By 2000, when the Pew Internet & American Life Project fielded our first survey, the proportion of internet users who said they ever did any banking online had risen to 17% or about 16 million Americans. Over the next few years, internet users ramped up a range of online financial and transactional activities, trusting more and more of their personal financial information to the Web. Among categories of activities, online banking and online auctions grew the most rapidly, especially among men, home broadband users, and internet users under the age of 50.1
Other forms of financial housework joined banking as popular online activities. In January 2005, 38% of internet users reported paying bills online. In December of that year a study fielded by Harris Interactive found that 35% of bills were paid online, up from 25% the year before.2 By comparison, 37.5% of bills are paid by paper check and 27.5% are paid some other way, such as in cash or by debit card.3
Ever larger numbers of internet users also turn to the web to seek financial advice and information. While the proportion of internet users who say they go online to get financial information such as stock quotes or interest rates has stayed constant at 44% since we began polling in 2000, the internet population base has risen steadily.4 By April 2006, according to comScore Media Metrix, four websites that combined money-management content with financial services ranked among the 20 most popular in the Business/Finance category: AOL Money & Finance, MSN Money, Yahoo! Finance, and CNN Money.5 In addition, a group of online magazines and websites, such as Motley Fool, contribute content to the larger information providers both print and online.
Financial sites are also hopping on the social networking bandwagon. A recent conference sponsored by Forrester Research focused on the online shift in retail financial services. Companies such as Yahoo! and Google discussed the benefits of creating online social networks for exchanging advice and pairing lenders with borrowers.6
Our December 2005 poll confirmed that online banking is holding steady as a mainstream internet activity, growing along with internet use generally, though not accelerating as have some other forms of online activities. Fully 43% of internet users, or about 63 million American adults, bank online. Home broadband users continue to lead the way, with 55% of these internet users banking online, compared with 35% of home dial-up users. Online banking is equally common among all age groups under the age of 65. Forty-two percent of internet users age 18-29, 47% of internet users age 30-49, and 42% of internet users age 50-64 bank online. However only 27% of internet users age 65 and older use their internet hookups for online banking. Also, we now find that men and women are equally likely to bank online.
One reason why online banking has not outpaced growth in internet use generally may be what industry analysts dub the “trust gap.” Trust is a big factor in choosing to bank online and then sticking with it despite news headlines about identity theft and phishing. Some industry analysts predict that online banking sites will have trouble attracting new customers because of the “trust gap” between internet users who are experienced with online financial transactions and those who are not.7 A 2005 report by Consumer WebWatch found that internet users who have used an e-commerce or financial management site are more trusting of online banking sites, automatic bill pay sites, credit history sites, and others. And internet users who have bought items online are more likely to say they have a lot of trust in online banking sites.8
Not surprisingly, those with more disposable income are more likely to take advantage of the perks of online banking, such as 24-hour access to accounts and higher interest rates. As of December 2005, 55% of internet users living in households with $75,000 or more in annual income say they bank online, compared with 29% of internet users living in households with less than $30,000 in annual income.
The Pew survey question did not distinguish between internet users who can access their regular bricks-and-mortar bank accounts online for such things as checking balances, paying bills, etc. and those who maintain accounts in internet-only banks. But there is evidence that internet users may be moving quite a bit of cash to their internet-only bank accounts. A 2005 report by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation reports that in December 2003, when online banking was still on a steep adoption curve among internet users, the average total assets of an internet-only bank were $3.5 billion, compared with only $1 billion for all banks.9
One reason for this gap is that a few huge internet-only banks are skewing the average. For example, ING Direct, which was established in 2000, already has 4 million customers and $59 billion in assets.10 Another reason for the difference is that many banks and thrifts draw from a local customer base, not a national one. For example, Adams County Building and Loan Company in West Union, Ohio, was established in 1907 and currently has $24 million in assets.11 The two banks simply serve different customers and different needs.
Moreover, while the percentage of internet users banking online is holding steady, internet users are increasing the frequency of their visits to banking and other financial websites. According to comScore Media Metrix, the number of unique visitors to Business/Finance websites grew by 9% between April 2005 and April 2006.12 The top five sites in that category for April 2006 were Bank of America, PayPal, JPMorgan Chase Property, AOL Money & Finance, and Capital One. What was the sixth most popular finance site in April? IRS.gov, of course.
- See “America’s Online Pursuits” by Mary Madden, Pew Internet & American Life Project, December 12, 2003. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2003/Americas-Online-Pursuits.aspx ↩
- See “Internet Activities,” Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/trends/Internet_Activities_4.26.06.htm ↩
- See “Pay Bills With a Click? More Americans Are Doing It and Banks Are Loving It,” by Bob Tedeschi, The New York Times, May 29, 2006. ↩
- See “Usage Over Time,” Pew Internet & American Life Project, at http://www.pewinternet.org/Trend-Data.aspx ↩
- Data provided on May 31, 2006, by Andrew Lipsman of comScore Networks, Inc. ↩
- See “Banking Shift: Advice, Service Get Less Formal,” by Marilyn Geewax, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, May 31, 2006. ↩
- See “Online Banking Customers: Attitudes and Activities,” by David Hallerman, eMarketer, November 2005. Available at: http://www.emarketer.com/Report.aspx?banking_on_nov05 ↩
- See “Leap of Faith: Using the Internet Despite the Dangers,” by Princeton Survey Research Associates International, for Consumer Reports WebWatch, October 26, 2005. Available at: http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/dynamic/web-credibility-reports-princeton.cfm ↩
- See “Limited-Purpose Banks: Their Specialties, Performance, and Prospects,” by Chiwon Yom, FDIC Banking Review, 2005, Vol. 17, No. 1. ↩
- See: http://www2.fdic.gov/structur/search/isinsured.asp?CERT=35489 ↩
- See http://www2.fdic.gov/idasp/main_bankfind.asp (search for FDIC Certificate #32304) ↩
- Data provided on May 31, 2006, by Andrew Lipsman of comScore Networks, Inc. ↩